Dev Ojha 6de7effb05 mempool no gossip back (#2778)
Closes #1798

This is done by making every mempool tx maintain a list of peers who its received the tx from. Instead of using the 20byte peer ID, it instead uses a local map from peerID to uint16 counter, so every peer adds 2 bytes. (Word aligned to probably make it 8 bytes)

This also required resetting the callback function on every CheckTx. This likely has performance ramifications for instruction caching. The actual setting operation isn't costly with the removal of defers in this PR.

* Make the mempool not gossip txs back to peers its received it from

* Fix adversarial memleak

* Don't break interface

* Update changelog

* Forgot to add a mtx

* forgot a mutex

* Update mempool/reactor.go

Co-Authored-By: ValarDragon <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update mempool/mempool.go

Co-Authored-By: ValarDragon <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com>

* Use unknown peer ID

Co-Authored-By: ValarDragon <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix compilation

* use next wait chan logic when skipping

* Minor fixes

* Add TxInfo

* Add reverse map

* Make activeID's auto-reserve 0

* 0 -> UnknownPeerID

Co-Authored-By: ValarDragon <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com>

* Switch to making the normal case set a callback on the reqres object

The recheck case is still done via the global callback, and stats
are also set via global callback

* fix merge conflict

* Addres comments

* Add cache tests

* add cache tests

* minor fixes

* update metrics in reqResCb and reformat code

* goimport -w mempool/reactor.go

* mempool: update memTx senders

I had to introduce txsMap for quick mempoolTx lookups.

* change senders type from []uint16 to sync.Map

Fixes DATA RACE:

```
Read at 0x00c0013fcd3a by goroutine 183:
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/mempool.(*MempoolReactor).broadcastTxRoutine()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/mempool/reactor.go:195 +0x3c7

Previous write at 0x00c0013fcd3a by D[2019-02-27|10:10:49.058] Read PacketMsg                               switch=3 peer=35bc1e3558c182927b31987eeff3feb3d58a0fc5@127.0.0.1
:46552 conn=MConn{pipe} packet="PacketMsg{30:2B06579D0A143EB78F3D3299DE8213A51D4E11FB05ACE4D6A14F T:1}"
goroutine 190:
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/mempool.(*Mempool).CheckTxWithInfo()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/mempool/mempool.go:387 +0xdc1
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/mempool.(*MempoolReactor).Receive()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/mempool/reactor.go:134 +0xb04
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p.createMConnection.func1()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/peer.go:374 +0x25b
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/conn.(*MConnection).recvRoutine()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/conn/connection.go:599 +0xcce

Goroutine 183 (running) created at:
D[2019-02-27|10:10:49.058] Send                                         switch=2 peer=1efafad5443abeea4b7a8155218e4369525d987e@127.0.0.1:46193 channel=48 conn=MConn{pipe} m
sgBytes=2B06579D0A146194480ADAE00C2836ED7125FEE65C1D9DD51049
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/mempool.(*MempoolReactor).AddPeer()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/mempool/reactor.go:105 +0x1b1
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p.(*Switch).startInitPeer()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/switch.go:683 +0x13b
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p.(*Switch).addPeer()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/switch.go:650 +0x585
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p.(*Switch).addPeerWithConnection()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/test_util.go:145 +0x939
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p.Connect2Switches.func2()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/test_util.go:109 +0x50

I[2019-02-27|10:10:49.058] Added good transaction                       validator=0 tx=43B4D1F0F03460BD262835C4AA560DB860CFBBE85BD02386D83DAC38C67B3AD7 res="&{CheckTx:gas_w
anted:1 }" height=0 total=375
Goroutine 190 (running) created at:
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/conn.(*MConnection).OnStart()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/conn/connection.go:210 +0x313
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/common.(*BaseService).Start()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/common/service.go:139 +0x4df
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p.(*peer).OnStart()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p/peer.go:179 +0x56
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/common.(*BaseService).Start()
      /go/src/github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/common/service.go:139 +0x4df
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p.(*peer).Start()
      <autogenerated>:1 +0x43
  github.com/tendermint/tendermint/p2p.(*Switch).startInitPeer()
```

* explain the choice of a map DS for senders

* extract ids pool/mapper to a separate struct

* fix literal copies lock value from senders: sync.Map contains sync.Mutex

* use sync.Map#LoadOrStore instead of Load

* fixes after Ismail's review

* rename resCbNormal to resCbFirstTime
2019-03-26 09:27:29 +01:00
..
2019-03-26 09:27:29 +01:00

Overview

This is a markdown specification of the Tendermint blockchain. It defines the base data structures, how they are validated, and how they are communicated over the network.

If you find discrepancies between the spec and the code that do not have an associated issue or pull request on github, please submit them to our bug bounty!

Contents

Data Structures

Consensus Protocol

P2P and Network Protocols

  • The Base P2P Layer: multiplex the protocols ("reactors") on authenticated and encrypted TCP connections
  • Peer Exchange (PEX): gossip known peer addresses so peers can find each other
  • Block Sync: gossip blocks so peers can catch up quickly
  • Consensus: gossip votes and block parts so new blocks can be committed
  • Mempool: gossip transactions so they get included in blocks
  • Evidence: sending invalid evidence will stop the peer

Software

  • ABCI: Details about interactions between the application and consensus engine over ABCI
  • Write-Ahead Log: Details about how the consensus engine preserves data and recovers from crash failures

Overview

Tendermint provides Byzantine Fault Tolerant State Machine Replication using hash-linked batches of transactions. Such transaction batches are called "blocks". Hence, Tendermint defines a "blockchain".

Each block in Tendermint has a unique index - its Height. Height's in the blockchain are monotonic. Each block is committed by a known set of weighted Validators. Membership and weighting within this validator set may change over time. Tendermint guarantees the safety and liveness of the blockchain so long as less than 1/3 of the total weight of the Validator set is malicious or faulty.

A commit in Tendermint is a set of signed messages from more than 2/3 of the total weight of the current Validator set. Validators take turns proposing blocks and voting on them. Once enough votes are received, the block is considered committed. These votes are included in the next block as proof that the previous block was committed - they cannot be included in the current block, as that block has already been created.

Once a block is committed, it can be executed against an application. The application returns results for each of the transactions in the block. The application can also return changes to be made to the validator set, as well as a cryptographic digest of its latest state.

Tendermint is designed to enable efficient verification and authentication of the latest state of the blockchain. To achieve this, it embeds cryptographic commitments to certain information in the block "header". This information includes the contents of the block (eg. the transactions), the validator set committing the block, as well as the various results returned by the application. Note, however, that block execution only occurs after a block is committed. Thus, application results can only be included in the next block.

Also note that information like the transaction results and the validator set are never directly included in the block - only their cryptographic digests (Merkle roots) are. Hence, verification of a block requires a separate data structure to store this information. We call this the State. Block verification also requires access to the previous block.