mirror of
https://github.com/fluencelabs/tendermint
synced 2025-06-12 21:01:21 +00:00
cs: sync WAL more frequently (#3300)
As per #3043, this adds a ticker to sync the WAL every 2s while the WAL is running. * Flush WAL every 2s This adds a ticker that flushes the WAL every 2s while the WAL is running. This is related to #3043. * Fix spelling * Increase timeout to 2mins for slower build environments * Make WAL sync interval configurable * Add TODO to replace testChan with more comprehensive testBus * Remove extraneous debug statement * Remove testChan in favour of using system time As per https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/pull/3300#discussion_r255886586, this removes the `testChan` WAL member and replaces the approach with a system time-oriented one. In this new approach, we keep track of the system time at which each flush and periodic flush successfully occurred. The naming of the various functions is also updated here to be more consistent with "flushing" as opposed to "sync'ing". * Update naming convention and ensure lock for timestamp update * Add Flush method as part of WAL interface Adds a `Flush` method as part of the WAL interface to enforce the idea that we can manually trigger a WAL flush from outside of the WAL. This is employed in the consensus state management to flush the WAL prior to signing votes/proposals, as per https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/3043#issuecomment-453853630 * Update CHANGELOG_PENDING * Remove mutex approach and replace with DI The dependency injection approach to dealing with testing concerns could allow similar effects to some kind of "testing bus"-based approach. This commit introduces an example of this, where instead of relying on (potentially fragile) timing of things between the code and the test, we inject code into the function under test that can signal the test through a channel. This allows us to avoid the `time.Sleep()`-based approach previously employed. * Update comment on WAL flushing during vote signing Co-Authored-By: thanethomson <connect@thanethomson.com> * Simplify flush interval definition Co-Authored-By: thanethomson <connect@thanethomson.com> * Expand commentary on WAL disk flushing Co-Authored-By: thanethomson <connect@thanethomson.com> * Add broken test to illustrate WAL sync test problem Removes test-related state (dependency injection code) from the WAL data structure and adds test code to illustrate the problem with using `WALGenerateNBlocks` and `wal.SearchForEndHeight` to test periodic sync'ing. * Fix test error messages * Use WAL group buffer size to check for flush A function is added to `libs/autofile/group.go#Group` in order to return the size of the buffered data (i.e. data that has not yet been flushed to disk). The test now checks that, prior to a `time.Sleep`, the group buffer has data in it. After the `time.Sleep` (during which time the periodic flush should have been called), the buffer should be empty. * Remove config root dir removal from #3291 * Add godoc for NewWAL mentioning periodic sync
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Anton Kaliaev
parent
d2c7f8dbcf
commit
dff3deb2a9
@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ func startNewConsensusStateAndWaitForBlock(t *testing.T, consensusReplayConfig *
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
select {
|
||||
case <-newBlockCh:
|
||||
case <-time.After(60 * time.Second):
|
||||
case <-time.After(120 * time.Second):
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Timed out waiting for new block (see trace above)")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ func TestWALCrash(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
func crashWALandCheckLiveness(t *testing.T, consensusReplayConfig *cfg.Config,
|
||||
initFn func(dbm.DB, *ConsensusState, context.Context), heightToStop int64) {
|
||||
walPaniced := make(chan error)
|
||||
crashingWal := &crashingWAL{panicCh: walPaniced, heightToStop: heightToStop}
|
||||
walPanicked := make(chan error)
|
||||
crashingWal := &crashingWAL{panicCh: walPanicked, heightToStop: heightToStop}
|
||||
|
||||
i := 1
|
||||
LOOP:
|
||||
@ -168,8 +168,8 @@ LOOP:
|
||||
i++
|
||||
|
||||
select {
|
||||
case err := <-walPaniced:
|
||||
t.Logf("WAL paniced: %v", err)
|
||||
case err := <-walPanicked:
|
||||
t.Logf("WAL panicked: %v", err)
|
||||
|
||||
// make sure we can make blocks after a crash
|
||||
startNewConsensusStateAndWaitForBlock(t, consensusReplayConfig, cs.Height, blockDB, stateDB)
|
||||
@ -190,14 +190,14 @@ LOOP:
|
||||
|
||||
// crashingWAL is a WAL which crashes or rather simulates a crash during Save
|
||||
// (before and after). It remembers a message for which we last panicked
|
||||
// (lastPanicedForMsgIndex), so we don't panic for it in subsequent iterations.
|
||||
// (lastPanickedForMsgIndex), so we don't panic for it in subsequent iterations.
|
||||
type crashingWAL struct {
|
||||
next WAL
|
||||
panicCh chan error
|
||||
heightToStop int64
|
||||
|
||||
msgIndex int // current message index
|
||||
lastPanicedForMsgIndex int // last message for which we panicked
|
||||
msgIndex int // current message index
|
||||
lastPanickedForMsgIndex int // last message for which we panicked
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// WALWriteError indicates a WAL crash.
|
||||
@ -232,8 +232,8 @@ func (w *crashingWAL) Write(m WALMessage) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if w.msgIndex > w.lastPanicedForMsgIndex {
|
||||
w.lastPanicedForMsgIndex = w.msgIndex
|
||||
if w.msgIndex > w.lastPanickedForMsgIndex {
|
||||
w.lastPanickedForMsgIndex = w.msgIndex
|
||||
_, file, line, _ := runtime.Caller(1)
|
||||
w.panicCh <- WALWriteError{fmt.Sprintf("failed to write %T to WAL (fileline: %s:%d)", m, file, line)}
|
||||
runtime.Goexit()
|
||||
@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ func (w *crashingWAL) SearchForEndHeight(height int64, options *WALSearchOptions
|
||||
func (w *crashingWAL) Start() error { return w.next.Start() }
|
||||
func (w *crashingWAL) Stop() error { return w.next.Stop() }
|
||||
func (w *crashingWAL) Wait() { w.next.Wait() }
|
||||
func (w *crashingWAL) Flush() error { return w.Group().Flush() }
|
||||
|
||||
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Handshake Tests
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user