4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Darius Clark
cbb9c7c0f3
feat(kad): allow to explicitly set Mode::{Client,Server}
The current implementation in Kademlia relies on an external address to determine if it should be in client or server mode. However there are instances where a node, which may know an external address, wishes to remain in client mode and switch to server mode at a later point.

This PR introduces `Kademlia::set_mode`, which accepts an `Option<Mode>` that would allow one to set `Mode::Client` for client mode, `Mode::Server` for server mode, or `None` to determine if we should operate as a client or server based on our external addresses.

Resolves #4074.

Pull-Request: #4132.
2023-07-04 06:07:56 +00:00
Thomas Eizinger
f335697573
fix(kad): allow for different order of events in assertion
Fixes the test failure witnessed in https://github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/actions/runs/5392115337/jobs/9790198947?pr=4128#step:6:162.

Pull-Request: #4129.
2023-06-28 12:26:44 +00:00
Thomas Eizinger
d5475fccde
fix(test): only listen on 127.0.0.1 for ephemeral swarm
This resolves an issue where our tests were depending on the number of network interfaces available on the local machine.

Related #4110.

Pull-Request: #4122.


  
Co-Authored-By: Thomas Eizinger <thomas@eizinger.io>
2023-06-27 01:21:47 +00:00
Thomas Eizinger
92c8cc451f
feat(kad): implement automatic client mode
Currently, the kademlia behaviour can only learn that the remote node supports kademlia on a particular connection if we successfully negotiate a stream to them.

Using the newly introduced abstractions from #3651, we don't have to attempt to establish a stream to the remote to learn whether they support kademlia on a connection but we can directly learn it from the `ConnectionEvent::RemoteProtocolsChange` event. This happens directly once a connection is established which should overall benefit the DHT.

Clients do not advertise the kademlia protocol and thus we will immediately learn that a given connection is not suitable for kadmelia requests. We may receive inbound messages from it but this does not affect the routing table.

Resolves: #2032.

Pull-Request: #3877.
2023-05-31 09:02:19 +00:00