The new check-for-number behavior of Lua arguments broke
users who use large strings of just integers.
The Lua number check would convert the string to a number, but
that breaks user data because
Lua numbers have limited precision compared to an arbitrarily
precise number wrapped in a string.
Regression fixed and new test added.
Fixes#1118 again.
Behrad Zari discovered [1] and Josiah reported [2]: if you block
and wait for a list to exist, but the list creates from
a non-push command, the blocked client never gets notified.
This commit adds notification of blocked clients into
the DB layer and away from individual commands.
Lists can be created by [LR]PUSH, SORT..STORE, RENAME, MOVE,
and RESTORE. Previously, blocked client notifications were
only triggered by [LR]PUSH. Your client would never get
notified if a list were created by SORT..STORE or RENAME or
a RESTORE, etc.
Blocked client notification now happens in one unified place:
- dbAdd() triggers notification when adding a list to the DB
Two new tests are added that fail prior to this commit.
All test pass.
Fixes#1668
[1]: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/redis-db/k4oWfMkN1NU
[2]: #1668
SPOP, tested in the new test, is among the commands rewritng the
client->argv argument vector (it gets rewritten as SREM) for command
replication purposes.
Because of recent optimizations to client->argv caching in the context
of the Lua internal Redis client, it is important to test for SPOP to be
callable from Lua without bad effects to the other commands.
Sometimes the process is still there but no longer in a state that can
be checked (after being killed). This used to happen after a call to
SHUTDOWN NOSAVE in the scripting unit, causing a false positive.
This commit sets the failover timeout to 30 seconds instead of the 180
seconds default, and allows to reconfigure multiple slaves at the same
time.
This makes tests less sensible to timing, with the result that there are
less false positives due to normal behaviors that require time to
succeed or to be retried.
However the long term solution is probably some way in order to detect
when a test failed because of timing issues (for example split brain
during leader election) and retry it.
It was verified in practice that this test is able to stress much more
the implementation by introducing errors that were only trivially to
detect with different offsets but impossible to detect starting always
at zero and counting bits the full length of the string.
An unit can abort in the middle for an error. The next unit should not
assume that the instances are in a clean state, and must restart what
was left killed.
Sentinel tests are designed to be dependent on the previous tests in the
same unit, so usually we can't continue with the next test in the same
unit if a previous test failed.
The test was previously performed by removing the master from the
Sentinel monitored masters. The test with the Sentinels crashed is
more similar to real-world partitions / failures.
The area a number of mandatory tests to craete a stable setup for
testing that is not too sensitive to timing issues. All those tests
moved to includes/init-tests, and marked as (init).
It is now possible to kill and restart sentinel or redis instances for
more real-world testing.
The 01 unit tests the capability of Sentinel to update the configuration
of Sentinels rejoining the cluster, however the test is pretty trivial
and more tests should be added.
