First, we must parse the IDs, so that we abort ASAP.
The return value of this command cannot be an error if
the client successfully acknowledged some messages,
so it should be executed in a "all or nothing" fashion.
the AOF will be loaded successfully, but the stream will be missing,
i.e inconsistencies with the original db.
this was because XADD with id of 0-0 would error.
add a test to reproduce.
This bug affected RM_StringToLongDouble and HINCRBYFLOAT.
I added tests for both cases.
Main changes:
1. Fixed string2ld to fail if string contains \0 in the middle
2. Use string2ld in getLongDoubleFromObject - No point of
having duplicated code here
The two changes above broke RM_SaveLongDouble/RM_LoadLongDouble
because the long double string was saved with length+1 (An innocent
mistake, but it's actually a bug - The length passed to
RM_SaveLongDouble should not include the last \0).
This commit solves the following bug:
127.0.0.1:6379> XGROUP CREATE x grp $ MKSTREAM
OK
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 666 f v
"666-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) 1) 1) "666-0"
2) 1) "f"
2) "v"
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 667 f v
"667-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XDEL x 667
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) (empty array)
The root cause is that we use s->last_id in streamCompareID
while we should use the last *valid* ID
This commit solves several edge cases that are related to
exhausting the streamID limits: We should correctly calculate
the succeeding streamID instead of blindly incrementing 'seq'
This affects both XREAD and XADD.
Other (unrelated) changes:
Reply with a better error message when trying to add an entry
to a stream that has exhausted last_id
Calling XADD with 0-0 or 0 would result in creating an
empty key and storing it in the database.
Even worse, because XADD will reply with error the action
will not be replicated, creating a master-replica
inconsistency
The XCLAIM docs state the XCLAIM increments the delivery counter for
messages. This PR makes the code match the documentation - which seems
like the desired behaviour - whilst still allowing RETRYCOUNT to be
specified manually.
My understanding of the way streamPropagateXCLAIM() works is that this
change will safely propagate to replicas since retry count is pulled
directly from the streamNACK struct.
Fixes#5194
This should be able to find new bugs and regressions about the new
sorted set update function when ZADD is used to update an element
already existing.
The test is able to find the bug fixed at 2f282aee immediately.
