mirror of
https://github.com/fluencelabs/redis
synced 2025-06-23 14:01:34 +00:00
Fix zero-ordering SORT when called against lists
People mostly use SORT against lists, but our prior behavior was pretending lists were an unordered bag requiring a forced-sort when no sort was requested. We can just use the native list ordering to ensure consistency across replicaion and scripting calls. Closes #2079 Closes #545 (again)
This commit is contained in:
@ -246,6 +246,24 @@ start_server {
|
||||
r sort mylist by num get x:*->
|
||||
} {100}
|
||||
|
||||
test "SORT by nosort retains native order for lists" {
|
||||
r del testa
|
||||
r lpush testa 2 1 4 3 5
|
||||
r sort testa by nosort
|
||||
} {5 3 4 1 2}
|
||||
|
||||
test "SORT by nosort plus store retains native order for lists" {
|
||||
r del testa
|
||||
r lpush testa 2 1 4 3 5
|
||||
r sort testa by nosort store testb
|
||||
r lrange testb 0 -1
|
||||
} {5 3 4 1 2}
|
||||
|
||||
test "SORT by nosort with limit returns based on original list order" {
|
||||
r sort testa by nosort limit 0 3 store testb
|
||||
r lrange testb 0 -1
|
||||
} {5 3 4}
|
||||
|
||||
tags {"slow"} {
|
||||
set num 100
|
||||
set res [create_random_dataset $num lpush]
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user