mirror of
https://github.com/fluencelabs/musl
synced 2025-05-28 15:11:34 +00:00
this seems counter-intuitive since sem_trywait is supposed to just try once, not wait for the semaphore. however, the retry loop is not a wait. instead, it's to handle the case where the value changes due to a simultaneous post or wait from another thread while the semaphore value remains positive. in such a case, it's absolutely wrong for sem_trywait to fail with EAGAIN because the semaphore is not busy.
14 lines
254 B
C
14 lines
254 B
C
#include <semaphore.h>
|
|
#include "pthread_impl.h"
|
|
|
|
int sem_trywait(sem_t *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
int val;
|
|
while ((val=sem->__val[0]) > 0) {
|
|
int new = val-1-(val==1 && sem->__val[1]);
|
|
if (a_cas(sem->__val, val, new)==val) return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
errno = EAGAIN;
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|