mirror of
https://github.com/fluencelabs/musl
synced 2025-06-30 23:21:56 +00:00
avoid accessing mutex memory after atomic unlock
this change is needed to fix a race condition and ensure that it's possible to unlock and destroy or unmap the mutex as soon as pthread_mutex_lock succeeds. POSIX explicitly gives such an example in the rationale and requires an implementation to allow such usage.
This commit is contained in:
@ -2,17 +2,5 @@
|
||||
|
||||
int pthread_mutex_lock(pthread_mutex_t *m)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r;
|
||||
|
||||
if (m->_m_type == PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL && !a_swap(&m->_m_lock, EBUSY))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
while ((r=pthread_mutex_trylock(m)) == EBUSY) {
|
||||
if (!(r=m->_m_lock) || (r&0x40000000)) continue;
|
||||
if ((m->_m_type&3) == PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK
|
||||
&& (r&0x1fffffff) == pthread_self()->tid)
|
||||
return EDEADLK;
|
||||
__wait(&m->_m_lock, &m->_m_waiters, r, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
return pthread_mutex_timedlock(m, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2,15 +2,23 @@
|
||||
|
||||
int pthread_mutex_timedlock(pthread_mutex_t *m, const struct timespec *at)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r, w=0;
|
||||
int r, t;
|
||||
|
||||
if (m->_m_type == PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL && !a_cas(&m->_m_lock, 0, EBUSY))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
while ((r=pthread_mutex_trylock(m)) == EBUSY) {
|
||||
if (!(r=m->_m_lock) || (r&0x40000000)) continue;
|
||||
if (!w) a_inc(&m->_m_waiters), w++;
|
||||
if (__timedwait(&m->_m_lock, r, CLOCK_REALTIME, at, 0) == ETIMEDOUT) {
|
||||
if (w) a_dec(&m->_m_waiters);
|
||||
return ETIMEDOUT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((m->_m_type&3) == PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK
|
||||
&& (r&0x1fffffff) == pthread_self()->tid)
|
||||
return EDEADLK;
|
||||
|
||||
a_inc(&m->_m_waiters);
|
||||
t = r | 0x80000000;
|
||||
a_cas(&m->_m_lock, r, t);
|
||||
r = __timedwait(&m->_m_lock, t, CLOCK_REALTIME, at, 0);
|
||||
a_dec(&m->_m_waiters);
|
||||
if (r && r != EINTR) break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (w) a_dec(&m->_m_waiters);
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2,15 +2,14 @@
|
||||
|
||||
int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *m)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int tid;
|
||||
int own;
|
||||
int tid, old, own;
|
||||
pthread_t self;
|
||||
|
||||
if (m->_m_type == PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL)
|
||||
return a_swap(&m->_m_lock, EBUSY);
|
||||
return a_cas(&m->_m_lock, 0, EBUSY) & EBUSY;
|
||||
|
||||
self = pthread_self();
|
||||
tid = self->tid | 0x80000000;
|
||||
tid = self->tid;
|
||||
|
||||
if (m->_m_type >= 4) {
|
||||
if (!self->robust_list.off)
|
||||
@ -20,14 +19,15 @@ int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *m)
|
||||
self->robust_list.pending = &m->_m_next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (m->_m_lock == tid && (m->_m_type&3) == PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE) {
|
||||
old = m->_m_lock;
|
||||
own = old & 0x7fffffff;
|
||||
if (own == tid && (m->_m_type&3) == PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE) {
|
||||
if ((unsigned)m->_m_count >= INT_MAX) return EAGAIN;
|
||||
m->_m_count++;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
own = m->_m_lock;
|
||||
if ((own && !(own & 0x40000000)) || a_cas(&m->_m_lock, own, tid)!=own)
|
||||
if ((own && !(own & 0x40000000)) || a_cas(&m->_m_lock, old, tid)!=old)
|
||||
return EBUSY;
|
||||
|
||||
m->_m_count = 1;
|
||||
|
@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
|
||||
int pthread_mutex_unlock(pthread_mutex_t *m)
|
||||
{
|
||||
pthread_t self;
|
||||
int waiters = m->_m_waiters;
|
||||
int cont;
|
||||
|
||||
if (m->_m_type != PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL) {
|
||||
if (!m->_m_lock)
|
||||
@ -16,15 +18,14 @@ int pthread_mutex_unlock(pthread_mutex_t *m)
|
||||
self->robust_list.pending = &m->_m_next;
|
||||
*(void **)m->_m_prev = m->_m_next;
|
||||
if (m->_m_next) ((void **)m->_m_next)[-1] = m->_m_prev;
|
||||
a_store(&m->_m_lock, 0);
|
||||
cont = a_swap(&m->_m_lock, 0);
|
||||
self->robust_list.pending = 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
a_store(&m->_m_lock, 0);
|
||||
goto wake;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
a_store(&m->_m_lock, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (m->_m_waiters) __wake(&m->_m_lock, 1, 0);
|
||||
cont = a_swap(&m->_m_lock, 0);
|
||||
wake:
|
||||
if (waiters || cont<0)
|
||||
__wake(&m->_m_lock, 1, 0);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user